Difference and diversity in Ontario Schooling Thesis

Difference and diversity in Ontario Schooling - Thesis Example scorn this, there atomic number 18 discontent voices in the overall knowledge system of Canada. Not enough is organism done in the education system to be able to provide all rounded education to people of diverging elaborations. It will be naive to think that by providing a standard piss of education to everyone would yield same desired results. The truth is gloss and diversity plays a key component part in the education of an individual. An individual is a product his surrounding and these surrounding dictates that adjustment should be make to accommodate, assimilate or just understand that particular individual. The Canadian system has been criticized for seemingly favoring the dominant culture at the expense of immigrant cultures. The dominant sporting culture seems to be the circulated and ideal way of living being fronted by the educational quotas. The concept of Educating across difference has had its fair form of challenges that have cultural connotations. In reality it is not the cultural values themselves that bring out the difference in the education system, however it is the values that are attached to particular cultural practices that breed contention. To bury our heads in the sand and give notice issues centering on power and minority can greatly work to undue our delicate hearty fabric. Power related issues such as ethnocentrism, racism and sexism should form the basis of the discussion on the divergent cultural issue. To be able to understand and appreciate the urban educational system, we first have to claim a brief history of Canada. When faced with the question of diversity and difference, Canada has chosen five broad found responses, each determined by the ideology that was stronger at that specific time in the period. These five responses are suppressing difference, insisting on the difference, denying difference, inviting difference and lastly critiquing differenc e. This model of response and framework have been granted by various scholars (Fleras and Elliot, 1992 and Murkerjee 1988 Sleeter and Grant 1944). 1. Suppressing Difference Aggressive Assimilation The first framework of suppressing is an unsurprising form of benignant reaction when one meets diversity and divergent views. The dominant and the most widespread at the time become precedence and any new culture has to conform to the pre-existing one. The need for civilize others saw several(prenominal) communities being forced to give up their language, religion and forced to embrace the superior French culture (Ashworth, 1993). This campaign of suppression was referred as aggressive assimilation and it was subjected on early immigrant families. The late 1800 brought more quests to Canadize the enormous numbers of immigrants arriving from Eastern and Southern European countries. This euphoria of the New Canada unwittingly gave rise of fascist and white supremacist movements, which h ad their support stemming, albeit innocently at first, from all lifestyles. Social Credit and CFF parties had endorsed such views bringing together the pertly formed the United Church of Canada (Jaenen, 1977, pg. 89). Theories of Social Darwism emphasized on the superiority of Christianity, Anglo-Saxon, Western industrialization and capitalism. and so in this sense education was to be used to eliminate the difference in culture and propagate the right cultures. 2. Insisting on Difference Separation and Segregation The